[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49651CB8.9060900@sgi.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2009 13:20:56 -0800
From: Mike Travis <travis@....com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] cpumask: more cpumask updates
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Mike Travis <travis@....com> wrote:
>
>> One big change to irq_desc and a few smaller maintenance type updates.
>>
>> cpumask: update irq_desc to use cpumask_var_t
>> cpumask: Use topology_core_cpumask()/topology_thread_cpumask()
>> cpumask: convert misc driver functions
>> cpumask: convert drivers/net/sfc
>> cpumask: convert other misc kernel functions
>>
>> Based on tip/cpus4096: v2.6.28-5703-g1d1a70e
>>
>> (Ingo - I added a blank line before the From: part and that seems to
>> separate it from the Subject. Hopefully your git-am will still
>> recognizes it - I did try a git-am here and it seemed to work ok.)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <travis@....com>
>
> Since you have it in a Git tree, why dont you send me a pull request?
>
> I might be more picky about pull requests in general (because it's harder
> to fix up a pulled tree than to fix up commits that come from emails - and
> it's also more work for you if i refuse to pull than if i have some
> comments over email-patches), but it's a much better (more scalable)
> workflow in the long run than the email path.
>
> Ingo
Ok, will do.
Thanks,
Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists