linux-kernel - [PATCH 17/18] oprofile: rename add_sample() in cpu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1231366655-17837-18-git-send-email-robert.richter@amd.com>
Date:	Wed, 7 Jan 2009 23:17:34 +0100
From:	Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	oprofile-list <oprofile-list@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
	Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>
Subject: [PATCH 17/18] oprofile: rename add_sample() in cpu_buffer.c

Rename the fucntion to op_add_sample() since there is a collision with
another one with the same name in buffer_sync.c.

Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>
---
 drivers/oprofile/cpu_buffer.c |   22 +++++++++++-----------
 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/oprofile/cpu_buffer.c b/drivers/oprofile/cpu_buffer.c
index 92bf8c0..ac79f66 100644
--- a/drivers/oprofile/cpu_buffer.c
+++ b/drivers/oprofile/cpu_buffer.c
@@ -188,8 +188,8 @@ unsigned long op_cpu_buffer_entries(int cpu)
 }
 
 static inline int
-add_sample(struct oprofile_cpu_buffer *cpu_buf,
-	   unsigned long pc, unsigned long event)
+op_add_sample(struct oprofile_cpu_buffer *cpu_buf,
+	      unsigned long pc, unsigned long event)
 {
 	struct op_entry entry;
 	int ret;
@@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ add_sample(struct oprofile_cpu_buffer *cpu_buf,
 static inline int
 add_code(struct oprofile_cpu_buffer *buffer, unsigned long value)
 {
-	return add_sample(buffer, ESCAPE_CODE, value);
+	return op_add_sample(buffer, ESCAPE_CODE, value);
 }
 
 /* This must be safe from any context. It's safe writing here
@@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ static int log_sample(struct oprofile_cpu_buffer *cpu_buf, unsigned long pc,
 			goto fail;
 	}
 
-	if (add_sample(cpu_buf, pc, event))
+	if (op_add_sample(cpu_buf, pc, event))
 		goto fail;
 
 	return 1;
@@ -337,14 +337,14 @@ void oprofile_add_ibs_sample(struct pt_regs * const regs,
 	}
 
 	fail = fail || add_code(cpu_buf, ibs_code);
-	fail = fail || add_sample(cpu_buf, ibs_sample[0], ibs_sample[1]);
-	fail = fail || add_sample(cpu_buf, ibs_sample[2], ibs_sample[3]);
-	fail = fail || add_sample(cpu_buf, ibs_sample[4], ibs_sample[5]);
+	fail = fail || op_add_sample(cpu_buf, ibs_sample[0], ibs_sample[1]);
+	fail = fail || op_add_sample(cpu_buf, ibs_sample[2], ibs_sample[3]);
+	fail = fail || op_add_sample(cpu_buf, ibs_sample[4], ibs_sample[5]);
 
 	if (ibs_code == IBS_OP_BEGIN) {
-		fail = fail || add_sample(cpu_buf, ibs_sample[6], ibs_sample[7]);
-		fail = fail || add_sample(cpu_buf, ibs_sample[8], ibs_sample[9]);
-		fail = fail || add_sample(cpu_buf, ibs_sample[10], ibs_sample[11]);
+		fail = fail || op_add_sample(cpu_buf, ibs_sample[6], ibs_sample[7]);
+		fail = fail || op_add_sample(cpu_buf, ibs_sample[8], ibs_sample[9]);
+		fail = fail || op_add_sample(cpu_buf, ibs_sample[10], ibs_sample[11]);
 	}
 
 	if (!fail)
@@ -376,7 +376,7 @@ void oprofile_add_trace(unsigned long pc)
 	if (pc == ESCAPE_CODE)
 		goto fail;
 
-	if (add_sample(cpu_buf, pc, 0))
+	if (op_add_sample(cpu_buf, pc, 0))
 		goto fail;
 
 	return;
-- 
1.6.0.1


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/