[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <496534BC.4060603@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2009 15:03:24 -0800
From: Om <om.turyx@...il.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: 64 bit PCI access using MMX register -- how?
Hi,
I have a buggy hardware with many 64 bit registers. (The bug is, when a
64bit read/write is split to two 32bit read/write, under high loads,
hardware would mess up the order of reads/writes. As a result,
read/written values would not be correct).
To avoid data corruption in 32bit Linux, when I implement `readq` as two
back to back `readl`, I need a lock serializing accesses to whole PIO
space. To avoid locking, I implemented suggestion from a friend to use
MMX registers like below.
#if BITS_PER_LONG == 32
static inline void hxge_writeq32(u64 val, void *addr)
{
u64 tmp = 0;
__asm__ __volatile__ (
"movq %%mm0, %[t]\n\t"
"movq %[d], %%mm0\n\t"
"movl %[a], %%eax\n\t"
"movq %%mm0, (%%eax)\n\t"
"movq %[t], %%mm0\n\t"
:[t] "+m"(tmp)
:[a] "r"(addr), [d] "m"(val)
:"%eax"
);
smp_wmb();
return;
}
static inline unsigned long long hxge_readq32(void __iomem *addr)
{
u64 var = 0, tmp = 0xfeedfacedeadbeefULL;
printk(KERN_ERR "addr= %#lx\n", (unsigned long) addr);
__asm__ __volatile__ (
"movq %%mm0, %[t]\n\t"
"movl %[a], %%eax\n\t"
"movq (%%eax), %%mm0\n\t"
"movq %%mm0, %[r]\n\t"
"movq %[t], %%mm0\n\t"
:[r] "=m"(var), [t]"+m"(tmp)
:[a] "r"(addr)
:"%eax"
);
smp_rmb();
printk(KERN_ERR "tmp = %#llx, var = %#llx\n", (unsigned long
long) tmp,
var);
return var;
}
#endif
All the reads return 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF when tried on ioremap_nocache()
PCI address space.
E.g, output from dmesg:
addr= 0xf9f80010
tmp = 0x0, var = 0xffffffffffffffff
data = 0xffffffffffffffff, da = 0xbc000004
(da is the result of 32bit read on the same address)
Any idea what could be wrong? Any suggestions / pointers?
( I am not subscribed, please CC: me)
I tried reading and writing an ordinary memory location ( a global u64
variable, that is working fine. Only PCI access gives a problem)
PCI access in the form of
val = *((u64*)ioremapped_address)
gets me the expected result. But my question is, is this operation
atomic in 32bit arch?
Thanks,
Om.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists