[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0901071518570.3057@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 15:19:23 -0800 (PST)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Peter Morreale <pmorreale@...ell.com>,
Sven Dietrich <SDietrich@...ell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v5][RFC]: mutex: implement adaptive spinning
On Wed, 7 Jan 2009, Dave Kleikamp wrote:
>
> Do you need to even do that if CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC is unset?
No.
> Something like:
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
> /*
> * Need to access the cpu field knowing that
> * DEBUG_PAGEALLOC could have unmapped it if
> * the mutex owner just released it and exited.
> */
> if (probe_kernel_address(&thread->cpu, cpu))
> break;
> #else
> cpu = thread->cpu;
> #endif
yes. That would work fine.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists