[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1231299888.14345.369.camel@localhost>
Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2009 19:44:48 -0800
From: Matt Helsley <matthltc@...ibm.com>
To: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>
Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>,
Linux Containers <containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Linux Containers <containers@...ts.osdl.org>,
Cedric Le Goater <clg@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/4] sunrpc: Use utsnamespaces
On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 19:23 -0500, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 19:20 -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > If it would be possible, for example, for the 'init' namespace to have
> > no network interfaces at all, then it would be nicer to use a name
> > that's at least been used with nfs at *some* point--just on the general
> > principle of not leaking information to a domain that the user wouldn't
> > expect it to.
>
> Then RPC would fail. Thanks to the limitations imposed by selinux &
> friends, all RPC sockets have to be owned by the init process.
Interesting -- I'm not familiar with this requirement of selinux. Must
it be the init process of the initial pid namespace or could any pid
namespace's init process own it?
Cheers,
-Matt Helsley
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists