linux-kernel - Re: hardirq.h removal broke sparc64 build...

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090108075625.GA14179@uranus.ravnborg.org>
Date:	Thu, 8 Jan 2009 08:56:25 +0100
From:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk, adobriyan@...il.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	sparclinux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: hardirq.h removal broke sparc64 build...

> 
> Actually, looking at the patch, where is the part from Alexey
> that does the "fix sparc64"?  I see nothing in the patch that
> would even appear to possibly be for that.  The diffstat is:
> 
>  arch/avr32/kernel/traps.c     |    1 +
>  arch/sh/kernel/traps_32.c     |    1 +
>  drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c |    1 +
>  include/asm-generic/local.h   |    1 -
>  4 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> Was Alexey's fix removed or lost? :-/

When I made my patch I saw some issues in non-sparc files
but I did not address these as I thought they were generic
bugs addressed by someone else.
I should have checked if the same build error was
also present on x86/arm then :-(

I'm glad to see it is sorted out properly now.

	Sam

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/