[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <604427e00901072357xbe39b1bu3e9f956640ede322@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 23:57:52 -0800
From: Ying Han <yinghan@...gle.com>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mike Waychison <mikew@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.29 -mm merge plans
yes. the change is in the last few lines of the patch. I found out
that the flags was set as FAULT_FLAG_WRITE no matter what(write/read)
whence FAULT_FLAG_RETRY is set. the new patch changed the logic which
only set the flag in the "write" case.
@@ -2713,8 +2720,10 @@ static int do_linear_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, struct
{
pgoff_t pgoff = (((address & PAGE_MASK)
- vma->vm_start) >> PAGE_SHIFT) + vma->vm_pgoff;
- unsigned int flags = (write_access ? FAULT_FLAG_WRITE : 0);
+ int write = write_access & ~FAULT_FLAG_RETRY;
+ unsigned int flags = (write ? FAULT_FLAG_WRITE : 0);
--Ying
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 8:41 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro
<kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
>> Hi Valdis:
>> Please try this fix and i tested on ubunbu8.10 with xmms and it helps.
>>
>
> Hi, Ying-san
> Could you please explain which was wrong and how to fix.
>
>
>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists