[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090108120338.6b8b4567@zonk.pl>
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 13:03:38 +0100
From: Adam Osuchowski <adwol@...k.pl>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Is 386 processor still supported?
Recently, I found such piece of code in kernel 2.6.28 compiled for 386
processor:
# grep M386 .config
CONFIG_M386=y
# objdump -d vmlinux | grep -A11 '<_spin_lock>:'
c0321827 <_spin_lock>:
c0321827: 89 e2 mov %esp,%edx
c0321829: 81 e2 00 f0 ff ff and $0xfffff000,%edx
c032182f: ff 42 14 incl 0x14(%edx)
c0321832: ba 00 01 00 00 mov $0x100,%edx
c0321837: f0 66 0f c1 10 lock xadd %dx,(%eax)
c032183c: 38 f2 cmp %dh,%dl
c032183e: 74 06 je c0321846 <_spin_lock+0x1f>
c0321840: f3 90 pause
c0321842: 8a 10 mov (%eax),%dl
c0321844: eb f6 jmp c032183c <_spin_lock+0x15>
c0321846: c3 ret
But there is no xadd instruction on 386 processors. It is available on
486+ only. I have no chance to run this kernel on real 386 box, so I can't
check it in practice, but I think it will not run.
It is not compiler problem because it is explicitly written in assembly
in __raw_spin_lock() function (include/asm-x86/spinlock.h) and there is
no alternative code depending on CONFIG_M386.
Regards.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists