linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH, resend] relatime: Let relatime update atime at least once per day

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 8 Jan 2009 23:29:53 +1100
From:	Peter Moulder <pjrm@...l.internode.on.net>
To:	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Éric Piel <E.A.B.Piel@...elft.nl>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH, resend] relatime: Let relatime update atime at least
	once per day

What was the fate of Ingo's previous patch[*1] to implement this (which,
incidentally, also included updates to documentation and made the interval
configurable as Éric Piel suggests) ?

[*1]: http://lwn.net/Articles/244384/

Just a minor nit, but the patch description (not included in the patch itself)
"at least once a day" isn't particularly accurate given that the patch enforces
at least a day [minus a second or so] has elapsed since the last update.  The
description in the above-referenced patch "only once a day" better captures the
situation, I think.

pjrm.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/