[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0901080924460.22642@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 09:24:55 -0500 (EST)
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] tracing/ftrace: handle more than one stat file
per tracer
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 10:50:35PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 7 Jan 2009, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> >
> > > Impact: new API for tracers
> > >
> > > Make the stat tracing API reentrant. And also provide the new directory
> > > /debugfs/tracing/trace_stat which will contain all the stat files for the
> > > current active tracer.
> > >
> > > Now a tracer will, if desired, want to provide a zero terminated array of
> > > tracer_stat structures.
> > > Each one contains the callbacks necessary for one stat file.
> > > It have to provide at least a name for its stat file, an iterator with
> > > stat_start/start_next callback and an output callback for one stat entry.
> > >
> > > Changes in v2:
> > >
> >
> > Hi Frederic,
> >
> > This patch fails to compile the branch tracer by itself. No patch should
> > break a build (for bisecting reasons).
> >
> > -- Steve
> >
>
> Hmm. Yes, so perhaps I can resend the two patches in one?
Sure.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists