[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49661F8B.5070103@sgi.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2009 07:45:15 -0800
From: Mike Travis <travis@....com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...source.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>,
virtualization@...ts.osdl.org, xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] cpumask: update irq_desc to use cpumask_var_t
Yinghai Lu wrote:
...
>> Or am I missing your point?
>
> static void init_copy_one_irq_desc(int irq, struct irq_desc *old_desc,
> struct irq_desc *desc, int cpu)
> {
> memcpy(desc, old_desc, sizeof(struct irq_desc));
>
>
> will overwrite new_desc->affinity and pending_mask
>
> YH
Yup, apparently I was missing your point (banging on head once more).
Thanks for spotting this!
Ingo - what's the state of tip/cpus4096? Shall I push this as an
append patch, or redo the original so bisectability works.
Also, Yinghai - would you know of a straight forward way to test
the irq migration? I have taken cpus offline and back online
but wasn't sure if any irq's were being moved off of cpu 0 which
cannot be taken offline.
Thanks,
Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists