[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200901081750.31637.borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 17:50:31 +0100
From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
To: Milton Miller <miltonm@....com>
Cc: Benjiman Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
linuxppc-dev list <linuxppc-dev@...abs.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Joe Peterson <joe@...rush.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] hvc_console: free_irq only if request_irq was successful
Am Donnerstag, 8. Januar 2009 schrieb Milton Miller:
> Only call free_irq if we marked the request_irq has having succeeded
> instead of whenever the the sub-driver identified the interrupt to use.
>
> Signed-off-by: Milton Miller <miltonm@....com>
> ---
> Appears to be a bugfix but might use a bit of time in -next.
> This code was created in 2.6.28 to allow s390 to build without adding
ifdefs.
> Many hvc-console sub-drivers have a single channel and are not modules.
>
> Index: work.git/drivers/char/hvc_irq.c
> ===================================================================
> --- work.git.orig/drivers/char/hvc_irq.c 2009-01-08 04:07:28.000000000 -0600
> +++ work.git/drivers/char/hvc_irq.c 2009-01-08 04:07:47.000000000 -0600
> @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ int notifier_add_irq(struct hvc_struct *
>
> void notifier_del_irq(struct hvc_struct *hp, int irq)
> {
> - if (!irq)
> + if (!hp->irq_requested)
> return;
> free_irq(irq, hp);
> hp->irq_requested = 0;
>
Looks sane.
Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists