linux-kernel - Re: [ntpwg] Bug: Status/Summary of slashdot leap-second crash on new years 2008-2009

Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Message-Id: <9981A902-73ED-44B9-87B5-803621BF307B@multicasttech.com>
Date:	Thu, 8 Jan 2009 13:57:24 -0500
From:	Marshall Eubanks <tme@...ticasttech.com>
To:	"M. Warner Losh" <imp@...imp.com>
Cc:	alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, david@...g.hm, hancockr@...w.ca,
	kyle@...fetthome.net, slashdot@...eshallam.info,
	goodgerster@...il.com, mayer@....isc.org, davidn@...idnewall.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ntpwg@...ts.ntp.isc.org,
	pretzalz@...hhouse.org, burdell@...ntheinter.net,
	linasvepstas@...il.com, nick@...k-andrew.net, jeff@...owsky.org
Subject: Re: [ntpwg] Bug: Status/Summary of slashdot leap-second crash on new years 2008-2009

On Jan 8, 2009, at 10:02 AM, M. Warner Losh wrote:

> In message: <20090108104854.2dbc41b1@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
>            Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> writes:
> : > On FreeBSD, Solaris and Digital Unix, I'll point out, that jumping
> : > backwards is used, and has been used since at least 1994.  So  
> saying
> : > it isn't used in the world today is flat out wrong.
> :
> : I stand by my comment - when was the last time the IERS used a leap
> : second removal ? The code may exist but it doesn't happen.
>
> Jumping backwards is used for every leap second that IERS has ever
> done, which was your original comment.  There's has never been a case
> where there was a leap second for jump forward though.  The proper
> technical term here is 'negative leap second'.  All leap seconds up
> until now have been positive leap seconds, and it is unlikely there
> ever will be a negative one.

I disagree. In the 1970's, the excess LOD was as much as 3 msec.
After going down some, the mid 1990's it rose to around 2 msec.
Now, it is around 1 msec.

Here is a plot

http://www.iers.org/MainDisp.csl?pid=95-100

Only the long period variations count for leap seconds - the seasonal  
and other high frequency
oscillations tend to average out.

In the early part of the last century (~1905), it decreased by ~ 5  
msec in a year or so.
If that happened right now, it would go to ~ -4 msec negative, and we  
would be seeing
2 negative leap seconds or more per year. Even if the decrease from  
1975 to 1985 happened again, it
would be at -1 msec, and we would have a negative leap second every  
two years or so.

What is a reasonable assumption is that we would likely have a year or  
more warning of the
likelihood of a negative leap second.

Regards
Marshall Eubanks

>
>
> Warner
> _______________________________________________
> ntpwg mailing list
> ntpwg@...ts.ntp.org
> https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/ntpwg

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives