[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0901081227360.3283@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 12:33:38 -0800 (PST)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: David Daney <ddaney@...iumnetworks.com>
cc: rusty@...tcorp.com.au, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mips@...ux-mips.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpumask fallout: Initialize irq_default_affinity
earlier.
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009, David Daney wrote:
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> + init_irq_default_affinity();
> +#endif
Don't do this. It's horrible. It makes the code much harder to read.
What's so wrong with initializing affinity on UP? It's still conceptually
a fine thing to do, although it's obviously trivially a no-op.
Also, since it's only used in "handle.c", why not just move it there?
Then, just make it static, and make it a no-op for the non-SMP case. Ok?
In fact, I think it already is a no-op in the UP case, and you can
literally just do
static inline void __init init_irq_default_affinity(void)
{
alloc_cpumask_var(&irq_default_affinity, GFP_KERNEL);
cpumask_setall(irq_default_affinity);
}
and be done with it. I think it should all compile away to nothing if
CONFIG_SMP isn't set.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists