[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <82ecf08e0901081414u15af3c2dy9c88a242db024dc7@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 20:14:36 -0200
From: "Thiago Galesi" <thiagogalesi@...il.com>
To: "Hugo Villeneuve" <hugo@...ovil.com>
Cc: "Florian Fainelli" <florian@...nwrt.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-embedded@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: FPGA programming driver architecture
> > > Hi,
> > > I have written some code to program a FPGA in Linux, for two
> > > different types of boards: one uses a serial interface (SPI) and
> > > the second a parallel interface. I have been able to sucessfully
> > > program both boards. I'm now trying to clean my code and make it
> > > more generic, as well as better in line with the Linux driver
> > > model.
Considering the several FPGA models available and ways to program it,
I guess the important thing to consider is what can be made generic.
(that is what will become fpgaload)
Also, there may be cases where after FPGA is programmed it "becomes a
device" (PCI or whatever)
> >
> > - fpgaload-core which contains all the code that can be shared
> > between the drivers like requesting firmware, providing sysfs
> > attributes,
> > - fpgaload-spi would handle the low-level SPI connection
> > - fpgaload-par would handle the low-level parallel connection
I think this maybe split into three layers (maybe)
1 - low level connection: paralell / spi / i2c / whatever
2 - vendor: xylinx, altera, etc
3 - generic stuff
Take a look at the MTD and SPI drivers and how they split things
--
-
Thiago Galesi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists