[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090108225050.GL9448@disturbed>
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 09:50:50 +1100
From: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
To: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Grissiom <chaos.proton@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] async: Don't call async_synchronize_full_special()
while holding sb_lock
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 09:46:31AM -0600, Dave Kleikamp wrote:
> sync_filesystems() shouldn't be calling async_synchronize_full_special
> while holding a spinlock. The second while loop in that function is the
> right place for this anyway.
Out of curiousity, what on earth does
async_synchronize_full_special() do and why does it need to be in
sync_filesystems()?
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@...morbit.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists