[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <18791.11036.50521.678702@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 21:46:52 +1100
From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH 4/9] perf_counter: Add dummy perf_counter_print_debug function
Impact: minimize requirements on architectures
Currently, an architecture just enabling CONFIG_PERF_COUNTERS but not
providing any extra functions will fail to build with
perf_counter_print_debug being undefined, since we don't provide an
empty dummy definition like we do with the hw_perf_* functions.
This provides an empty dummy perf_counter_print_debug() to make it
easier for architectures to turn on CONFIG_PERF_COUNTERS.
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
---
diff --git a/kernel/perf_counter.c b/kernel/perf_counter.c
index 9ad11e4..4c0dccb 100644
--- a/kernel/perf_counter.c
+++ b/kernel/perf_counter.c
@@ -54,6 +54,8 @@ int __weak hw_perf_group_sched_in(struct perf_counter *group_leader,
return 0;
}
+void __weak perf_counter_print_debug(void) { }
+
static void
list_add_counter(struct perf_counter *counter, struct perf_counter_context *ctx)
{
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists