[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090109.230626.126760668.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2009 23:06:26 +0900 (JST)
From: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@....ocn.ne.jp>
To: haavard.skinnemoen@...el.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, maciej.sosnowski@...el.com,
dan.j.williams@...el.com
Subject: Re: dw_dmac driver questions
On Mon, 05 Jan 2009 23:02:30 +0900 (JST), Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@....ocn.ne.jp> wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 23:39:32 +0900 (JST), Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@....ocn.ne.jp> wrote:
> > Hi. I'm writing a new DMA driver, using dw_dmac driver in kernel
> > 2.6.28 as a reference implementation.
> >
> > I can see an outline of the dw_dmac driver and framework (well,
> > hopefully), but have some questions in details.
>
> One more.
One more again.
5. dwc_issue_pending()
Is this needed? The dwc_tx_submit might queue the descriptor, but it
should be issued automatically after completion of all descriptors in
active list.
It yes, it seems implementation like this would be possible:
* dwc_tx_submit() just always add the descriptor to queue list even if
active list was empty.
* dwc_issue_pending() call dwc_dostart() and move queued descriptor(s)
to active list, if the active list was empty.
But I'm not sure "chain as many as possible at a time" is really
better then "start engine as soon as possible".
---
Atsushi Nemoto
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists