| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 08:37:08 -0800 (PST) From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>, Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, Peter Morreale <pmorreale@...ell.com>, Sven Dietrich <SDietrich@...ell.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH -v7][RFC]: mutex: implement adaptive spinning On Fri, 9 Jan 2009, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > > __asm_inline was my suggestion, to distinguish "inline this > unconditionally because gcc screws up in the presence of asm()" THERE IS NO ASM IN THERE! Guys, look at the code. No asm. The whole notion that gcc gets confused by inline asms IS BOGUS. It's simply not TRUE. Gcc gets confused because gcc is confused, and it has NOTHING to do with inline asms. So please don't confuse things further. Linus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists