[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090108175338.2abbee16.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 17:53:38 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Phillip Lougher <phillip@...gher.demon.co.uk>,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Squashfs pull request for 2.6.29
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 11:50:29 -0500 Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 04:48:51PM +0000, Phillip Lougher wrote:
> > Please consider pulling my linux-next branch
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pkl/squashfs-linus.git
> >
> > The patches have been posted to LKML and linux-fsdevel over the last
> > couple of months and have been reviewed and changed as requested.
> > Diffstat below.
> >
> > Squashfs is a compressed read-only filesystem. It compresses metadata
> > and data, and uses up to 1 MiB block sizes for greater compression.
>
> That seems pretty fast for something only posted this week and not
> even in -next.
I discussed this with Phillip a bit, and it looks like we'll go for a
2.6.21 merge. This gives a couple of months for testing and review in
linux-next.
Of course, this assumes that someone will actually perform that testing
and review. Chances are that it'll just sit there, getting nothing more
than compilation testing.
Apparently I reviewed the code a while back - that grey cell must have
died. Does anyone else intend to review the code in that timeframe?
If not, we might as well merge it now, if ever..
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists