linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] Squashfs pull request for 2.6.29

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090109165422.GF24884@logfs.org>
Date:	Fri, 9 Jan 2009 17:54:22 +0100
From:	Jörn Engel <joern@...fs.org>
To:	Phil Oester <kernel@...uxace.com>
Cc:	Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
	Phillip Lougher <phillip@...gher.demon.co.uk>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Squashfs pull request for 2.6.29

On Thu, 8 January 2009 18:36:29 -0800, Phil Oester wrote:
> 
> Agreed...I'm tired of having to pull along a patch to vanilla kernels
> for squashfs.  Drivers are merged that don't even _work_ these days,
> so why is there so much concern about merging something which almost
> all distros use which impacts almost nothing if you don't enable it???

In general, filesystems and ABI changes are special because stupid
mistakes are eternal.  If some device driver has a bug, you can fix it,
reboot and be done with it.  Not so with filesystems.

Jörn

-- 
to show off how geeky they were.
-- Rob Enderle
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/