linux-kernel - Re: New true IDE compact flash driver starting point?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 9 Jan 2009 18:29:24 +0000
From:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	Dick Hollenbeck <dick@...tplc.com>
Cc:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: New true IDE compact flash driver starting point?

> 1) Since this is for a quasi realtime application, is there any 
> advantage to using the interrupt line regarding how the CPU spends its 
> idle time waiting for the flash?  (I have an interrupt line I can use.)  
> Currently I am not sending in the IRQ resource, resource array length of 
> 2, not 3.

For real time you may actually be better with the IRQless polling
behaviour as the driver and ATA library currently stands.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/