[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <84fc9c000901091110n2f5565b7mecf9acec35cf5a0@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 20:10:20 +0100
From: "Richard Guenther" <richard.guenther@...il.com>
To: "Andi Kleen" <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: "Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Matthew Wilcox" <matthew@....cx>,
"Dirk Hohndel" <hohndel@...radead.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"jim owens" <jowens@...com>,
"Chris Mason" <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@...dmis.org>, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
"Gregory Haskins" <ghaskins@...ell.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Nick Piggin" <npiggin@...e.de>,
"Peter Morreale" <pmorreale@...ell.com>,
"Sven Dietrich" <SDietrich@...ell.com>, jh@...e.cz
Subject: Re: [patch] measurements, numbers about CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING=y impact
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 8:21 PM, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:
>> GCC 4.3 should be good in compiling the
>> kernel with default -Os settings.
>
> It's unfortunately not. It doesn't inline a lot of simple asm() inlines
> for example.
Reading Ingos posting with the actual numbers states the opposite.
Richard.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists