[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090109194026.GM26290@one.firstfloor.org>
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 20:40:26 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@...il.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>,
Dirk Hohndel <hohndel@...radead.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
jim owens <jowens@...com>,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Peter Morreale <pmorreale@...ell.com>,
Sven Dietrich <SDietrich@...ell.com>, jh@...e.cz
Subject: Re: [patch] measurements, numbers about CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING=y impact
On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 08:10:20PM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 8:21 PM, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:
> >> GCC 4.3 should be good in compiling the
> >> kernel with default -Os settings.
> >
> > It's unfortunately not. It doesn't inline a lot of simple asm() inlines
> > for example.
>
> Reading Ingos posting with the actual numbers states the opposite.
Hugh had some numbers upto 4.4.0 20090102 in
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/775254/focus=777231
which demonstrated the problem.
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists