[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090109215423.GA7869@suse.de>
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 13:54:23 -0800
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>,
linux1394-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jay Fenlason <fenlason@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH post 2.6.28] firewire: core: fix sleep in atomic
context due to driver core change
On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 09:17:18PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Jan 2009 20:49:37 +0100 (CET)
> Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de> wrote:
>
> > Due to commit 2831fe6f9cc4e16c103504ee09a47a084297c0f3, "driver core:
> > create a private portion of struct device", device_initialize() can no
> > longer be called from atomic contexts.
>
> I don't see why this is neccessary or appropriate - the original commit
> needs to be pulled and the private area allocation rethought.
Ugh, I think you're right. I'll revert this (and all of the patches in
the series that were needed to get this working properly), and redo the
patch set, first making device_initialize() able to fail, and auditing
all callers to make sure it's not being called in atomic context.
At first glance, I think it's only firewire that is doing this in atomic
context, so Stefan, I wouldn't mind seeing your patch go in as-is just
to make things simpler overall.
I'll go make up the patchset and send them to Linus...
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists