[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090109023629.GA29520@linuxace.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 18:36:29 -0800
From: Phil Oester <kernel@...uxace.com>
To: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>
Cc: Phillip Lougher <phillip@...gher.demon.co.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Squashfs pull request for 2.6.29
On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 03:24:40AM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 03:11, Phillip Lougher
> <phillip@...gher.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> > Andrew Morton wrote:
> >> Apparently I reviewed the code a while back - that grey cell must have
> >> died. Does anyone else intend to review the code in that timeframe? If
> >> not, we might as well merge it now, if ever..
> >>
> >
> > I'll be very happy for a merge now, but of course it's not up to me :-(
>
> I guess, it is hard to find a larger distro that does not merge the
> out-of-tree version to support their live-, and installer-cds. So,
> what argument is preventing a mainline merge now?
Agreed...I'm tired of having to pull along a patch to vanilla kernels
for squashfs. Drivers are merged that don't even _work_ these days,
so why is there so much concern about merging something which almost
all distros use which impacts almost nothing if you don't enable it???
Phil
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists