lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1231460791.6621.54.camel@carll-linux-desktop>
Date:	Thu, 08 Jan 2009 16:26:31 -0800
From:	Carl Love <cel@...ibm.com>
To:	Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>
Cc:	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, oprofile-list@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	cel <cel@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	cbe-oss-dev <cbe-oss-dev@...abs.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch 0/3] Overview, OProfile SPU event profiling support for
	IBM Cell processor


On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 16:48 +0100, Robert Richter wrote:
> On 01.12.08 16:18:26, Carl Love wrote:
> > This is a rework of the previously posted set of patches.
> > 
> > Patch 1 is the user level patch to add the SPU events to the user
> > OProfile tool.  
> > 
> > Patch 2 is a kernel patch to do code clean up and restructuring to make
> > it easier to add the new SPU event profiling support.  This patch makes
> > no functional changes.
> > 
> > Patch 3 is a kernel patch to add the SPU event profiling support.
> 
> I applied patch 2 & 3 to:
> 
>  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rric/oprofile.git cell
> 
> The patches did not apply cleanly. I had to change the path to
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/, fix cell/pr_util.h and did some whitespace
> cleanups. Please run your tests on the cell branch.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> -Robert
> 

I pulled down the git tree, compiled and installed it.  I tested it
against the OProfile testsuite, which includes SPU event profiling
tests.  Everything passed.  The patch I submitted was against a 2.6.26
tree.  You are now on a 2.6.28 tree so perhaps that is why the patch did
not apply cleanly.  The patch has been out there for some time.  

            Carl Love


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ