[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4967DFD3.8070100@tremplin-utc.net>
Date:	Sat, 10 Jan 2009 00:37:55 +0100
From:	Éric Piel <eric.piel@...mplin-utc.net>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	mm-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: - lis3lv02d-separate-the-core-from-hp-acpi-api.patch removed
 from -mm tree
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Jan 2009 00:00:03 +0100
> Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz> wrote:
> 
>>> The patch titled
>>>      LIS3LV02D: separate the core from HP ACPI API
>>> has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
>>>      lis3lv02d-separate-the-core-from-hp-acpi-api.patch
>>>
>>> This patch was dropped because other changes were merged, which wrecked this patch
>> I'm confused. The other patch collided with leds/Makefile changes, but
>> this one applies cleanly over Linus' git (updated today)... or am I
>> doing something wrong? Could it still be pushed to Linus?
> 
> umm, sure, we can try that.
> 
> Please don't use vague terms like "the other patch".  I assume you're
> referring to lis3lv02d-merge-with-leds-hp-disk.patch?
> 
> It has more problems than a simple makefile conflict.  People keep on
> changing stuff in linux-next.  
I'm also confused because from your "-mm merge plans" mail I had
understood that both patches would be merged in 2.6.29, and they both
still apply fine on Linus' tree. How come it's a problem they conflicts
in linux-next? Is it because this is currently the merge window? Do I
have to update the patches against linux-next and send them back to you?
Let me know what you need :-)
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
