[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090109134736.a995fc49.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 13:47:36 +0900
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
lizf@...fujitsu.com, menage@...gle.com,
"kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com" <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/4] memcg: fix for
mem_cgroup_get_reclaim_stat_from_page
On Fri, 9 Jan 2009 10:02:57 +0530
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > pc = lookup_page_cgroup(page);
> > + smp_rmb();
>
> Do you really need the read memory barrier?
>
Necessary.
> > + if (!PageCgroupUsed(pc))
> > + return NULL;
> > +
>
> In this case we've hit a case where the page is valid and the pc is
> not. This does fix the problem, but won't this impact us getting
> correct reclaim stats and thus indirectly impact the working of
> pressure?
>
- If retruns NULL, only global LRU's status is updated.
Because this page is not belongs to any memcg, we cannot update
any counters. But yes, your point is a concern.
Maybe moving acitvate_page() to
==
do_swap_page()
{
- activate_page()
mem_cgroup_try_charge()..
....
mem_cgroup_commit_charge()....
....
+ activate_page()
}
==
is necessary. How do you think, kosaki ?
Thanks,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists