linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND][RFC PATCH v2] waitfd

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1231599141.11642.58.camel@quest>
Date:	Sat, 10 Jan 2009 14:52:21 +0000
From:	Scott James Remnant <scott@...onical.com>
To:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc:	Casey Dahlin <cdahlin@...hat.com>,
	Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
	Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...il.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
	Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [RESEND][RFC PATCH v2] waitfd

On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 22:39 +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:

> Btw. It is not that I am trying to argue against sys_waitfd(), but do
> you have the "real life" example when it can be useful? Yes, poll().
> But we have signalfd. SIGCHLD is not rt signal, but afaics this is not
> the problem actually. Just curious.
> 
signalfd() can't currently be made to work in the way you describe.

Scott
-- 
Scott James Remnant
scott@...onical.com

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (198 bytes)