[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4968B929.10801@katalix.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 15:05:13 +0000
From: James Chapman <jchapman@...alix.com>
To: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
CC: davem@...emloft.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, devel@...nvz.org, xemul@...nvz.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 3/4] net: pppol2tp - introduce net-namespace functionality
Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> [Cyrill Gorcunov - Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 02:13:59PM +0300]
> | [James Chapman - Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 11:06:08AM +0000]
> | | Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> | | > - Each tunnel and appropriate lock are inside own namespace now.
> | | > - pppox code allows to create per-namespace sockets for
> | | > both PX_PROTO_OE and PX_PROTO_OL2TP protocols. Actually since
> | | > now pppox_create support net-namespaces new PPPo... protocols
> | | > (if they ever will be) should support net-namespace too otherwise
> | | > explicit check for &init_net would be needed.
Ok, I tested this in my L2TP setup. The first ppp session setup fails
because the PPPIOCNEWUNIT ioctl returns -EEXIST. I think the problem is
the logic in ppp_create_interface(), which does the following to create
a new ppp interface:
/* Initialize the new ppp unit */
ppp->file.index = unit;
sprintf(dev->name, "ppp%d", unit);
ret = register_netdev(dev);
Looks like there is more work to do in the ppp changes.
--
James Chapman
Katalix Systems Ltd
http://www.katalix.com
Catalysts for your Embedded Linux software development
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists