linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND][RFC PATCH v2] waitfd

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1231607398.11642.104.camel@quest>
Date:	Sat, 10 Jan 2009 17:09:58 +0000
From:	Scott James Remnant <scott@...onical.com>
To:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc:	Casey Dahlin <cdahlin@...hat.com>,
	Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
	Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...il.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
	Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [RESEND][RFC PATCH v2] waitfd

On Sat, 2009-01-10 at 17:19 +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:

> I am not sure we are talking about the same thing, but afaics poll() +
> signalfd can work to (say) reap the childs. Actually, ppoll() alone is
> enough.
> 
Last time I checked, ppoll() was not actually implemented across all
architectures in a manner that solved the race it was intended to solve.

I'd be delighted to learn that this had been fixed? :-)

Soctt
-- 
Scott James Remnant
scott@...onical.com

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (198 bytes)