[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0901101015290.6528@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 10:30:23 -0800 (PST)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
cc: Jörn Engel <joern@...fs.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, David Brown <lkml@...idb.org>,
Phil Oester <kernel@...uxace.com>,
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
Phillip Lougher <phillip@...gher.demon.co.uk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Squashfs pull request for 2.6.29
On Sat, 10 Jan 2009, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> More importantly, the filesystem driver has to be able to read older
> filesystem instances. This is a userspace-visible binary interface!
> A really complex one.
Well, the good news is that read-only filesystems are _sooo_ much simpler
than any real filesystem that quite frankly, on a "complexity" scale it's
still way way down there.
Also, if it's not used for backup (and I don't think anybody would),
there's actually less reason to be back-wards compatible. I know I changed
cramfs a few times incompatibly, simply becaus "you might as well just
re-run the user tools to generate the image". It was for a similar need,
and the image really always goes along with the kernel.
I think squashfs usage would be similar - you'd not have squashfs as a
standalone media, it would be a "installation medium" thing.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists