[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1231613042.3706.16.camel@johannes>
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 19:44:02 +0100
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To: Jörn Engel <joern@...fs.org>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] add b+tree library
On Sat, 2009-01-10 at 19:39 +0100, Jörn Engel wrote:
> On Sat, 10 January 2009 21:29:04 +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> > >
> > > Joern is going to use it for logfs, that's the point. Not sure about
> > > other filesystems.
> >
> > Why can't you investigate other filesystem?
> > if this library is used by only one fs, why does this library routine
> > need to linux/lib/ directory?
>
> Because it is not used for on-disk data structures. It is an
> alternative to radix trees, rbtrees, hash tables or linked lists.
Sorry, I misunderstood the question here.
Also, to elaborate on that answer, I'm going to use this as a sort of
hash table for wireless, where it ensures better scalability than a pure
hashtable from quiet environments (say wireless off on an airplane) to
your wireless test lab (100+ access points)
johannes
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists