linux-kernel - Re: Regulator consumer and i2c device interaction.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4968ED0D.9040103@gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 10 Jan 2009 18:46:37 +0000
From:	Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...il.com>
To:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org
CC:	Mark Brown <broonie@...ena.org.uk>
Subject: Re: Regulator consumer and i2c device interaction.

Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> Currently regulator consumers are registered and identified via a pointer to the relevant
> device:
>
> e.g. via a regulator consumer supply structure:
> static struct regulator_consumer_supply imote2_sensor_3_con[] = {
> 	{
> 		.dev = &sht15.dev,
> 		.supply = "vcc",
> 	},
> };
>
> static struct regulator_init_data imote2_ldo_init_data[] = {{
> 	{
> 	 	.constraints = {
> 		.name = "vcc_sensor_3",
> 		.min_uV = 2800000,
> 		.max_uV = 3000000,
> 		.valid_ops_mask = REGULATOR_CHANGE_VOLTAGE,
> 	},
> 	.num_consumer_supplies = ARRAY_SIZE(imote2_sensor_3_con),
> 	.consumer_supplies = imote2_sensor_3_con,
> },
> };
>
> and relevant association with a regulator driver.
>
> Now in the case of i2c devices, the struct device  pointer is created
> somewhat later and isn't readily available.
>
> I think the struct device pointer is only used as device instance specific
> token in the regulator framework.  If so is there any reason it can't be
> relaxed to a void * thus allowing something else to be used in i2c drivers?
>
> If so what could actually be used?  Unfortunately all the data elements
> of i2c_board_info are coppied out (rather than a pointer to the original
> structure being used) so that's not currently available.  I guess it could
> be made so at the cost of a single pointer in each i2c_client structure.
>   
Oops, that won't work as typically these are specified __initdata .
Any suggestions for alternatives?
> So the question is how would people prefer to do this?
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Jonathan Cameron
>
>   

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/