| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 18:58:31 +0000 From: Mark Brown <broonie@...ena.org.uk> To: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...il.com> Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Liam Girdwood <lrg@...nel.org> Subject: Re: Regulator: Use case query (many devices need to reg their voltage requirements?) On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 06:05:25PM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > It maps fine, particularly as quite a few daughter boards have local (be > it static) > regulators to ensure clean supplies etc. Note that there's a fixed voltage regulator driver in the tree for handling those. > > There will also be issues if the drivers are for chips > > which have multiple software compatible variants with differing power > > requirements. > Yup, though in many cases they have different part numbers etc and can > be handled via multiple > driver registrations or alias provisions such as in i2c. This is how > things like adc's with differing > numbers of inputs depending on precise model are handled anyway. That is doable but error prone, especially if doing something like adding regulator support to an existing driver or when new parts come out. Often the part numbers are only slight different (adding an additional letter at the end of the day) which doesn't help. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists