[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1231618940.3706.31.camel@johannes>
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 21:22:20 +0100
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: Jörn Engel <joern@...fs.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] add b+tree library
On Sat, 2009-01-10 at 20:41 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net> writes:
>
> > Also, to elaborate on that answer, I'm going to use this as a sort of
> > hash table for wireless, where it ensures better scalability than a pure
> > hashtable from quiet environments (say wireless off on an airplane) to
> > your wireless test lab (100+ access points)
>
> Is there any particular reason you can't use the standard rbtrees
> for that?
It just seemed like a lot of overhead, no particular reason I guess.
johannes
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists