linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 15/16] dma-debug: x86 architecture bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090110230454.GI17917@elte.hu>
Date:	Sun, 11 Jan 2009 00:04:54 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com,
	dwmw2@...radead.org, fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/16] dma-debug: x86 architecture bindings


* Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com> wrote:

> @@ -105,6 +109,7 @@ dma_unmap_single(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t addr, size_t size,
>  	struct dma_mapping_ops *ops = get_dma_ops(dev);
>  
>  	BUG_ON(!valid_dma_direction(direction));
> +	debug_unmap_single(dev, addr, size, direction);

It all looks very nice, i've got one small namespace structure request: 
could you please name all the callbacks in a consistent way, so that they 
mirror the method they instrument - with a "debug_" prefix?

I.e. the above one would be: debug_dma_unmap_single().

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/