[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200901101541.15192.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 15:41:13 +1030
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: David Daney <ddaney@...iumnetworks.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpumask fallout: Initialize irq_default_affinity earlier.
On Friday 09 January 2009 07:26:59 Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Thu, 8 Jan 2009, David Daney wrote:
> >
> > The 'inline' seems gratuitous to me. Since it is static GCC should do
> > the Right Thing. However since you suggested it, I am testing it that
> > way.
>
> Trust me, gcc very seldom does the Right Thing(tm) when it comes to
> inlining.
>
> Linus
Note that there's a downside: with inline funcs in .c files you don't get
a warning should they become unused in future cleanups.
Cheers,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists