[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200901101648.32757.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 16:48:31 +1030
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for January 8 (percpu)
On Friday 09 January 2009 08:53:22 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> (Forward to Rusty)
>
> On Thu, 08 Jan 2009 09:23:55 -0800 Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com> wrote:
> >
> > Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Changes since 20090107:
> > >
> > > Undropped tree:
> > > rr
> > >
> > > Dropped trees (temporarily):
> > > ocfs2 (build problem)
> > > cpu_alloc (build problem)
> >
> >
> > When CONFIG_SMP=n, both arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h and
> > include/asm-generic/percpu.h define both of
> > read_percpu_ptr() and read_percpu_var().
Erk... this header is a bit of a mess of 64bit/32bit UP/SMP defines.
I've thwacked it harder, thanks!
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists