[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090111013940.GL12885@elte.hu>
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 02:39:40 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rcu: convert rcupreempt trace to seq file
* Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 03:48:46PM +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
> > Impact: also fix a bug in show_rcustats()
> >
> > Use seq file for simplification, and the global buffer and mutex can be
> > removed.
>
> Looks very good, and passes my tests.
>
> > While doing this, I found rcustats will never show 'ggp' and 'rcc' fields
> > due to a bug in show_rcustats().
>
> Good eyes!
>
> The only change I ask is that you pull the contents of
> rcupreempt_debugfs_init() into the now-one-line rcupreempt_trace_init().
>
> With that change:
>
> Tested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> > ---
> > kernel/rcupreempt_trace.c | 155 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
i think the whole kernel/rcupreempt_trace.c file might be a good candidate
for the 'statistical tracing' extensions to ftrace that Frederice is
working on.
That way there would just be a few tracepoints, and the rest would be done
in kernel/tracing/trace_rcupreempt.c, or so.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists