[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090111014429.GN12885@elte.hu>
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 02:44:29 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] Performance counters for POWER
* Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org> wrote:
> The following series of patches extends Ingo and Thomas's performance
> counter framework to add support for 64-bit POWER processors.
> Currently I have the PPC970 family and POWER6 done.
>
> The approach I have taken is to do the constraint checking and the
> search through the space of alternative event codes as each group of
> counters is added at the time a task is scheduled in. That means we
> are potentially doing the search several times in a row, with
> interrupts disabled. I think it will be OK since there are only a few
> events that have alternatives (and not many of them), and the
> constraint checking is fast since it is just simple integer
> operations. However, one of the things I plan to do is to instrument
> that code to find out how long it takes in the worst case. (If it
> takes too long then I will need some major changes to the generic
> code.)
>
> This series is also available via git at:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulus/perfcounters.git
>
> in the master branch.
Pulled into tip/perfcounters/core, thanks Paul!
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists