linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.29-rc1: Reported regressions from 2.6.28

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200901112001.00394.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date:	Sun, 11 Jan 2009 20:00:59 +0100
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderlinux@...il.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Natalie Protasevich <protasnb@...il.com>,
	Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>,
	Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux PM List <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	Linux SCSI List <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.29-rc1: Reported regressions from 2.6.28

On Sunday 11 January 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderlinux@...il.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> > >
> > > Regressions with patches
> > > ------------------------
> > >
> > > Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12428
> > > Subject         : Build error on latest git
> > > Submitter       : Petr Titera <P.Titera@...tury.cz>
> > > Date            : 2009-01-11 9:49 (1 days old)
> > > References      : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123166856318712&w=4
> > > Handled-By      : Petr Titera <P.Titera@...tury.cz>
> > > Patch           : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123167509024996&w=4
> > 
> > This is a wrong fix, asm/smp.h should only be included when CONFIG_SMP 
> > is defined.
> > 
> > I am still in the process of cleaning non-smp data from asm/smp.h for 
> > x86
> > 
> > Attach patch is the solution for the time being
> > 
> > Ingo, can you please put this in urgent queue.
> 
> yes, it already is - see below.

Link to this patch was added to the bug entry.  Pleaes let me know or close the
bug when it's merged.

Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/