[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49696127.2000901@lougher.demon.co.uk>
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 03:01:59 +0000
From: Phillip Lougher <phillip@...gher.demon.co.uk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Leon Woestenberg <leon.woestenberg@...il.com>,
kernel@...uxace.com, kay.sievers@...y.org, mingo@...e.hu,
jeff@...zik.org,
Geert Uytterhoeven <Geert.Uytterhoeven@...ycom.com>,
hpa@...or.com, kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com,
Jörn Engel <joern@...fs.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Squashfs pull request for 2.6.29
Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Fri, 9 Jan 2009, Alan Cox wrote:
>
>>> Of course, this assumes that someone will actually perform that testing
>>> and review. Chances are that it'll just sit there, getting nothing more
>>> than compilation testing.
>> Almost every distribution ships the updated version and has done for ages
>> - exactly what kind of testing is going to beat that ?
>
> Yes, if this is really in use by everybody, then not merging it is kind of
> pointless.
>
> Linus
>
Great news... Thanks everyone for reviewing Squashfs and helping
to get it merged.
Phillip
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists