[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090111.135029.199678338.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 13:50:29 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: travis@....com
Cc: sfr@...b.auug.org.au, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, rusty@...tcorp.com.au
Subject: Re: cpumask change causes sparc build bustage
From: Mike Travis <travis@....com>
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 08:49:46 -0800
> Thanks for fixing it. In actuality though, it should return cpu_mask_all
> instead of CPU_MASK_ALL_PTR but that's a small nit.
CPU_MASK_ALL_PTR is defined to &cpu_mask_all, that's why I used it, to
be consistent with the other macro using CPU_MASK_ALL right above it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists