[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090111215603.GB19261@localhost>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 00:56:03 +0300
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
To: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, devel@...nvz.org, xemul@...nvz.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/4] net namespace for PPP
[Alexey Dobriyan - Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 12:27:00AM +0300]
| On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 10:51:54PM +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
| > here is a series of RFC in attempt to implement
| > net-namespaces for PPP protocol (including PPPoE
| > and PPPoL2TP).
|
| You need assign netns to netdevice after alloc_netdev().
| This should fix much confusion and non-bugs mentioned in this thread.
|
| After that struct ppp shouldn't need netns pointer as it will be netns
| of it's netdevice.
Good point, thanks!
|
| current->nsproxy->net_ns while being correct in ioctl context
| (it's synchronous) is easy to screwup. For example, in netfilter code netns
| is taken from socket on which ioctl is done.
Didn't know that, will check.
|
| Regardless of netns, try_module_get() calls by hand are suspicious
| and they're copied to netns init hook.
|
Thanks a lot for comments Alexey! Module related calls are not needed
indeed.
- Cyrill -
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists