[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49697646.6000701@sgi.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 20:32:06 -0800
From: Mike Travis <travis@....com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] kstat: modify kstat_irqs_legacy to be variable sized
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Mike Travis <travis@....com> wrote:
...
>>>> Allocate kstat_irqs_legacy based on nr_cpu_ids to deal with this
>>>> memory usage bump when NR_CPUS bumped from 128 to 4096:
>>>>
>>>> 8192 +253952 262144 +3100% kstat_irqs_legacy(.bss)
>>>>
...
>>>> + /* allocate based on nr_cpu_ids */
>>>> + kstat_irqs_legacy = alloc_bootmem(NR_IRQS_LEGACY * nr_cpu_ids *
>>>> + sizeof(int));
...
>>> btw., while at it - dont we want to upgrade this to a 'long' (in a
>>> separate commit)? Having more than 4 billion irqs after bootup is easily
>>> possible.
Looking at this more closely, it seems it would be better to per_cpu_alloc
the legacy kstat_irqs as that would place the value being incremented on the
node of the cpu doing the incrementing.
This, of course, would need the early per_cpu_alloc (in bootmem) that
the new cpu_alloc changes from Christoph and Rusty is providing.
Thanks,
Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists