[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20704.1231655763@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 01:36:03 -0500
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jörn Engel <joern@...fs.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, David Brown <lkml@...idb.org>,
Phil Oester <kernel@...uxace.com>,
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
Phillip Lougher <phillip@...gher.demon.co.uk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Squashfs pull request for 2.6.29
On Sat, 10 Jan 2009 10:30:23 PST, Linus Torvalds said:
> I think squashfs usage would be similar - you'd not have squashfs as a
> standalone media, it would be a "installation medium" thing.
Actually, for some of us, squashfs would *usually* be a standalone - my biggest
application for it is when I end up having to can-opener some wonky install
medium that one of my users is having a problem with. And of course, I
have to use some *other* kernel/system to do the can-opener trick with, because
if the one on the medium worked, the user wouldn't be standing in my office :)
Fortunately, that usually means I'm using a recent -mm kernel on my laptop,
and the kernel/medium I'm trying to debug is almost always older, so I don't
have to worry much about a too-new medium. Anybody comes in my office with
something even more bleeding edge than what I have, I damn well expect them
to be able to debug the issue themselves. ;)
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists