[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090112202427.3b918490.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 20:24:27 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Mike Travis <travis@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure
Hi Ingo,
On Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:05:52 +0100 Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>
> Yeah - and that build bug was stupid too - when touching a generic file
> that is called include/linux/cpufreq.h and changing a key data field one
> should at minimum get the idea that it's generic for a reason and should
> start grepping the tree ...
>
> It slipped through because it didnt get caught in build tests because
> cpufreq isnt enabled in the powerpc defconfig.
Which is one of the reasons we have linux-next: "integration testing".
This way not every developer/maintainer has to have/use cross compilers
for every (or even many) non-native (from their point of view)
architectures.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists