[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090112101803.GB10086@uranus.ravnborg.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 11:18:03 +0100
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To: "Mark A. Miller" <mark@...ell.org>
Cc: Bernd Petrovitsch <bernd@...mix.at>,
Leon Woestenberg <leon.woestenberg@...il.com>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Embedded Linux mailing list <linux-embedded@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: PATCH [0/3]: Simplify the kernel build by removing perl.
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 11:50:31PM -0600, Mark A. Miller wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 11:35 PM, Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org> wrote:
> >> There are several other packages which are broken for embedded
> >> architectures, which I will hopefully attempt to fix by submitting patches
> >> upstream. But this is why we should be cautious about including new tools
> >> for compiling the kernel. Sam Ravnborg was correct in that a C program to do
> >> the work would be the proper way. But by not addressing a currently existing
> >> problem with an adequate replacement with something that does not exist
> >> currently, seems faulty.
> >
> > Why are "make headers_install" such a crucial thing for your
> > embedded environmnet?
>
> Sanity check. If the environment cannot replicate itself, then
> something has been faulty in the cross-compiling stage, that was used
> to propagate a native environment for the target architecture.
So you actually build your target toolchain on your target?
Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists